Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Paradise Lost Book 1- By John Milton| Bangla lecture| lines (84-187)

 


If thou beest he; But oh how fallen! how changed From him, who in the happy realms of light Clothed with transcendent brightness didst outshine Myriads though bright: If he whom mutual league, United thoughts and counsels, equal hope And hazard in the glorious enterprise, Joined with me once, now misery hath joined In equal ruin: into what pit thou seest From what heighth fallen, so much the stronger proved He with his thunder: and till then who knew The force of those dire arms? yet not for those, Nor what the Potent Victor in his rage Can else inflict, do I repent or change, Though changed in outward luster; that fixed mind And high disdain, from sense of injured merit, That with the mightiest raised me to contend, And to the fierce contention brought along Innumerable force of spirits armed That durst dislike his reign, and me preferring, His utmost power with adverse power opposed In dubious battle on the plains of Heaven, And shook his throne. What though the field be lost? All is not lost; the unconquerable will, And study of revenge, immortal hate, And courage never to submit or yield: And what is else not to be overcome? That glory never shall his wrath or might Extort from me. To bow and sue for grace With suppliant knee, and deify his power, Who from the terror of this arm so late Doubted his empire, that were low indeed, That were an ignominy and shame beneath This downfall; since by fate the strength of gods And this empyreal substance cannot fail, Since through experience of this great event In arms not worse, in foresight much advanced, We may with more successful hope resolve To wage by force or guile eternal war Irreconcilable, to our grand Foe, Who now triumphs, and in the excess of joy Sole reigning holds the tyranny of Heaven. So spake the apostate angel, though in pain, Vaunting aloud, but racked with deep despair: And him thus answered soon his bold Compeer. Oh Prince, Oh chief of many throned powers, That led the embattled seraphim to war Under thy conduct, and in dreadful deeds Fearless, endangered Heaven’s perpetual King; And put to proof his high supremacy, Whether upheld by strength, or chance, or fate, Too well I see and rue the dire event, That with sad overthrow and foul defeat Hath lost us Heaven, and all this mighty host In horrible destruction laid thus low, As far as gods and heavenly essences Can perish: for the mind and spirit remains Invincible, and vigor soon returns, Though all our glory extinct, and happy state Here swallowed up in endless misery. But what if he our Conqueror, (whom I now Of force believe Almighty, since no less Then such could have overpowered such force as ours) Have left us this our spirit and strength entire Strongly to suffer and support our pains, That we may so suffice his vengeful ire, Or do him mightier service as his thralls By right of war, what e're his business be Here in the heart of Hell to work in fire, Or do his errands in the gloomy deep; What can it then avail though yet we feel Strength undiminished, or eternal being To undergo eternal punishment? Whereto with speedy words the arch-fiend replied. Fallen Cherub, to be weak is miserable Doing or suffering: but of this be sure, To do ought good never will be our task, But ever to do ill our sole delight, As being the contrary to his high will Whom we resist. If then his providence Out of our evil seek to bring forth good, Our labor must be to pervert that end, And out of good still to find means of evil; Which oft times may succeed, so as perhaps Shall grieve him, if I fail not, and disturb His inmost counsels from their destined aim. But see the angry Victor hath recalled His ministers of vengeance and pursuit Back to the gates of Heaven: The sulfurous hail Shot after us in storm, overblown hath laid The fiery Surge, that from the precipice Of Heaven received us falling, and the thunder, Winged with red lightning and impetuous rage, Perhaps hath spent his shafts, and ceases now To bellow through the vast and boundless deep. Let us not slip the occasion, whether scorn, Or satiate fury yield it from our foe. Seest thou yon dreary plain, forlorn and wild, The seat of desolation, void of light, Save what the glimmering of these livid flames Casts pale and dreadful? Thither let us tend From off the tossing of these fiery waves, There rest, if any rest can harbor there, And reassembling our afflicted powers,


Wednesday, October 9, 2019

The Good-Morrow


John  Donne
Born     22 January 1572[1]
London, England
Died     31 March 1631 (aged 59)[2]
London, England
Occupation      Poet, priest, lawyer
Nationality        English
Alma mater      Hart Hall, Oxford
University of Cambridge
Genre  Satire, love poetry, elegy, sermons
Subject            Love, sexuality, religion, death
Literary movement      Metaphysical poetry

"The Good-Morrow" is a poem by John Donne, published in his 1633


What Are The Literary Devices in The Good-Morrow?

Alliteration
When two or more words in close proximity begin with the same consonant:
were we not weaned...
snorted we in the Seven Sleepers'...
Which watch not...

Assonance
When two or more words in a line have the same vowel sounds:
sucked on country...
Seven Sleepers' den...
all love of other...
tine in mine...
true plain hearts do...


Caesura
A pause in a line caused by punctuation, where the reader has to pause. There are several in this poem, typified in line 14, where there are two:
Let us possess one world, each hath one, and is one.

What Is The Metre (Meter in American English) of The Good-Morrow?

There are five regular beats and ten syllables in each line except for the last line of each stanza which has twelve, so count as hexameters.

There are 13 lines of pure iambic pentameter ( 1,6, 8-13, 16,17,19,20) with a regular daDUM daDUM beat.

 

won / der, by / my troth, / what thou / and I
Did, till / we loved? / Were we / not weaned / till then?
But sucked / on count / ry pleas / ures, chil / dishly?
Or snor / ted we / in the Sev / en Sleep / ers’ den?
’Twas so; / but this, / all pleas / ures fanc / ies be.
If ev / er an / beau / ty I / did see,
Which I / desired, / and got, / ’twas but / a dream / of thee.

And now / good-mor / row to / our wa / king souls,
Which watch / not one / anoth / er out / of fear;
For love, / all love / of oth / er sights / controls,
And makes / one lit / tle room / an eve / rywhere.
Let sea- / discove / rers to / new worlds / have gone,
Let maps / to oth / ers, worlds / on worlds / have shown,
Let us / possess / one world, / each hath / one, and / is one.

My face / in thine / eyethine / in mine / appears,
And true / plain hearts / do in / the fa / ces rest;
Where can / we find / two bet / ter hem / ispheres,
Without /sharpnorth, / without / declin / ing west?
Whatev / er dies, / was not / mixed e / qually;
If our / two loves / be one, / or, thou / and I
Love so / alike, / that none / do slack / en, none / can die.

This is a poem written by John Donne.
It is a love poem.
 The poem is important for first-year honors students in English Department.

The poem was written when John Donne was a a student in "Lincoln's Inn" school.

Its published in 1633.(two years later of his death)
Lines21
Stanza:3(7 lines per stanza)



The Good-Morrow is a three-stanza poem,

each stanza has 7 lines (heptet).

The rhyme scheme is unusual :
 ababccc 


 The first four lines of each stanza working together in alternate



The poem is considered as the first poem of Donne.

The poem took from "Songs and Sonnets" book of Donne.
This poem is also considered as the first poem of "Songs and sonnets "

Theme: Sensual love to spiritual love
\
The title means good morning (Good-Morrow) is archaic, an old fashioned way of greeting someone.









The Good-Morrow


I wonder, by my troth, what thou and I
Did, till we loved? Were we not weaned till then?
But sucked on country pleasures, childishly?
Or snorted we in the Seven Sleepers’ den?
’Twas so; but this, all pleasures fancies be.
If ever any beauty I did see,
Which I desired, and got, ’twas but a dream of thee.



And now good-morrow to our waking souls,
Which watch not one another out of fear;
For love, all love of other sights controls,
And makes one little room an everywhere.

Let sea-discoverers to new worlds have gone,
Let maps to other, worlds on worlds have shown,
Let us possess one world, each hath one, and is one.

My face in thine eye, thine in mine appears,
And true plain hearts do in the faces rest;
Where can we find two better hemispheres,
Without sharp north, without declining west?
Whatever dies, was not mixed equally;
If our two loves be one, or, thou and I
Love so alike, that none do slacken, none can die.





Stanza 1
Knowing that the title means good morning (Good-Morrow is archaic, an old fashioned way of greeting someone. Donne liked to join some of his words with a hyphen) the reader has a clue that the scene is set early in the day.
The the first line takes the reader into the mind of the first-person speaker, who is either asking himself or his lover a puzzling question. Note the language, it's 17th century English, so thou means you and by my troth means in all honesty or truth.
The first-line runs on into the second (enjambment) and the caesurae (pauses caused by punctuation) ensure that the reader cannot go too quickly through these words. This is a carefully phrased question.
And that small phrase Did, till we loved? is important because it gives sense to the previous line and sets the poem off proper. Just what kind of existence did the pair have before they became lovers before they fell in love?
It's a question many lovers have asked because when two become firmly entrenched in love it's as if the time previous to their meeting holds no value. They never lived, they didn't do anything meaningful.
Were we not weaned till then? To be weaned is to be influenced from an early age; to be a baby or an infant gradually given adult food whilst coming off a diet of mother's milk. The speaker is implying that they were infants before they loved it.
The third line reinforces this sense of childish existence the two had to go through. The country pleasures are either crude sensualities or immature sexual pleasures, mere surface experiences.
Or they lived life asleep as it were. The allusion is to the Seven Sleepers, Christian youths who fled from the Roman emperor Decius (249-251) and were sealed in a cave. They slept for nearly two hundred years so the story goes, waking up in a world where Christianity had taken hold.
So the implication is that these two lived as if asleep until they fell in love and woke up - their love became a kind of new religion for them.
These four lines, with alternate rhymes, form a quatrain. The end three lines consolidate meaning, have the same end rhymes and have that final hexameter, a long line.
Twas so; ...the speaker confirms that, yes, before they were lovers any pleasures were not real; it was as if they were infants asleep, not really awake but merely dreaming.
And Donne being Donne he goes on to say that his desires were fulfilled - he got what he wanted out of beauty - but even that wasn't real, it was only a dream.





Stanza 2
Having concluded in the first stanza that the lovers weren't really alive, or hadn't done anything, until they fell in love and became aware, the speaker wishes both of them a good morning as they wake.
There is no fear in their relationship; they are totally devoted, 100% in love, which is the be-all and end all. They see the world through their love, through love.
And makes one little room an everywhere....the room the lovers are in is small, a microcosm, yet because their love is universal, it goes everywhere their love goes, and is whole, a macrocosm.
This the line reflects the Renaissance idea that an individual held within them the universe.
 The last three lines of this stanza are related to the exploration of new worlds. Donne's use of metaphor is cutting edge for his time - explorers were discovering new terrestrial worlds using the latest maps, and astronomers were beginning to seriously chart the stars.
The known world was expanding rapidly. Donne connects this fact with the world the lovers have created.
Let us possess one world (in some versions this is our world)...the speaker affirms that they have their individual worlds but their love world they possess, they totally own a whole new world which they are free to explore.


Stanza 3
In the third stanza the speaker initially gets close up and personal.
Donne's fascination with reflections and imagery comes to the fore. As the lovers gaze into each other's eyes they see each other reflected. Evidence of more bonding, of two becoming one.
The lovers are true and plain - they don't have to pretend or show off or be fancy - in front of one another.
The speaker reverts to questioning again, as in the first stanza, and asks Where can we find two better hemispheres (semi-circles) ...which could be their eyes and faces.
Without sharp North....the cold north, relating to a cold relationship
without declining West...the sun sets in the west, end of the day, end of a relationship.
So the speaker in these four lines reinforces the idea that the lovers are a single entity; their relationship isn't cold or about to end, it is warm and rising.
Whatever dies was not mixed equally....In the medical theory of the time death was thought to be the result of imbalances in the body's elements.
If our two loves...the speaker suggests that their two loves are not at all imbalanced, their loves are so alike that they can never die.
This is an idealistic end to the poem but Donne's original take on what love is remains with us today in popular musical lyrics for example.



















Stanza 1
Knowing that the title means good morning (Good-Morrow is archaic, an old fashioned way of greeting someone. Donne liked to join some of his words with a hyphen) the reader has a clue that the scene is set early in the day.
The first-line takes the reader into the mind of the first-person speaker, who is either asking himself or his lover a puzzling question. Note the language, it's 17th century English, so thou means you and by my troth means in all honesty or truth.
The first line runs on into the second (enjambment) and the caesurae (pauses caused by punctuation) ensure that the reader cannot go too quickly through these words. This is a carefully phrased question.
And that small phrase Did, till we loved? is important because it gives sense to the previous line and sets the poem off proper. Just what kind of existence did the pair have before they became lovers before they fell in love?
It's a question many lovers have asked because when two become firmly entrenched in love it's as if the time previous to their meeting holds no value. They never lived, they didn't do anything meaningful.
Were we not weaned till then? To be weaned is to be influenced from an early age; to be a baby or an infant gradually given adult food whilst coming off a diet of mother's milk. The speaker is implying that they were infants before they loved it.
 the third line reinforces this sense of childish existence the two had to go through. The country pleasures are either crude sensualities or immature sexual pleasures, mere surface experiences.
Or they lived life asleep as it were. The allusion is to the Seven Sleepers, Christian youths who fled from the Roman emperor Decius (249-251) and were sealed in a cave. They slept for nearly two hundred years so the story goes, waking up in a world where Christianity had taken hold.
So the implication is that these two lived as if asleep until they fell in love and woke up - their love became a kind of new religion for them.
These four lines, with alternate rhymes, form a quatrain. The end three lines consolidate meaning, have the same end rhymes and have that final hexameter, a long line.
Twas so; ...the speaker confirms that, yes, before they were lovers any pleasures were not real; it was as if they were infants asleep, not really awake but merely dreaming.
And Donne being Donne he goes on to say that his desires were fulfilled - he got what he wanted out of beauty - but even that wasn't real, it was only a dream.



The Restoration period English literature


The Restoration period
(1660-1700)

The restoration of monarchy was remarkable in this period. The English literary tradition was re-established in this period. So this period is called the Restoration period.


It began in 1660 when the English, Scottish and Irish monarchies were all restored under King Charles II. ... The term Restoration is used to describe both the actual event by which the the the monarchy was restored and the period of several years afterwards in which a new political settlement was established.

The Restoration refers to the restoration of the monarchy when Charles II was restored to the throne of England following an eleven-year Commonwealth period during which the country was governed by Parliament under the direction of the Puritan General Oliver Cromwell.
Restoration. Restoration, Restoration of the monarchy in England in 1660. It marked the return of Charles II asking (1660–85) following the period of Oliver Cromwell's Commonwealth. The bishops were restored to Parliament, which established a strict Anglican orthodoxy.

Restoration literature is the English literature written during the historical period commonly referred to as the English Restoration (1660–1689), which corresponds to the last years of Stuart reign in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland.
Industrialization developed in this period in England. The printing press was made free in order to enjoy the freedom of writing. The Bill of rights was approved in 1689.Royal society was set up in order to encourge scientific research.
Milton, John Bunyan, John Dryden, and William Congrive were powerful and influential writers in this period. Paradise lost, Samson Agonistes, The way of the World, Pilgrim’s Progress, Absalom and Achitophel are some remarkable creations of this age. The major literary works of the age were satiric.

     1660: Restoration–Charles II, Stuart monarchy
     1662: Royal Society established
     1685: James, Duke of York, succeeds his brother Charles II
     1688: Glorious Revolution–James II deposed, William and Mary share the English throne
     1689: Bill of Rights–limits crown, affirms supremacy of Parliament
     1689: Toleration Act–religious freedom for dissenters
     1690: John Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding
     1707: Act of Union–England and Scotland for Great Britain
     1745: Last Jacobite uprising




Restoration literature is the English literature was written during the historical period commonly referred to as the English Restoration(1660–1689), which corresponds to the last years of Stuart reign in England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. In general, the term is used to denote roughly homogenous styles of literature that center on a celebration of or reaction to the restored court of Charles II. It is a literature that includes extremes, for it encompasses both Paradise Lost and the Earl of Rochester's Sodom, the high-spirited sexual comedy of The Country Wife and the moral wisdom of The Pilgrim's Progress. It saw Locke's Treatises of Government, the founding of the Royal Society, the experiments and holy meditations of Robert Boyle, the hysterical attacks on theaters from Jeremy Collier, and the pioneering of literary criticism from John Dryden and John Dennis. The period witnessed news become a commodity, the essay develop into a periodical art form, and the beginnings of textual criticism.
     The dates for Restoration literature are a matter of convention, and they differ markedly from genre to genre. Thus, the "Restoration" in drama may last until 1700, while in poetry it may last only until 1666 (see 1666 in poetry) and the annus mirabilis; and in prose it might end in 1688, with the increasing tensions over succession and the corresponding rise in journalism and periodicals, or not until 1700, when those periodicals grew more stabilized. In general, scholars use the term "Restoration" to denote the literature that began and flourished under Charles II, whether that literature was the laudatory ode that gained a new life with restored aristocracy, the eschatological literature that showed an increasing despair among Puritans, or the literature of rapid communication and trade that followed in the wake of England's mercantile empire.
    
    
    
The Protectorate (1653–1659), might have continued if Oliver Cromwell's son Richard, who was made Lord Protector on his father's death, had been capable of carrying on his father's policies. Richard Cromwell's main weakness was that he did not have the confidence of the army. After seven months, an army faction known as the Wallingford House party removed him on 6 May 1659 and reinstalled the Rump Parliament and the second period of Commonwealth rule.
     Charles Fleetwood was appointed a member of the Committee of Safety and of the Council of State, and one of the seven commissioners for the army. On 9 June 1659, he was nominated lord-general (commander-in-chief) of the army. However, his leadership was undermined in Parliament, which chose to disregard the army's authority in a similar fashion to the post-First Civil War Parliament. A royalist uprising was planned for 1 August 1659, but it was foiled. However, Sir George Booth gained control of Cheshire; Charles II hoped that with Spanish support he could effect a landing, but none was forthcoming. Booth held Cheshire until the end of August when he was defeated by General Lambert.
     The Commons, on 12 October 1659, cashiered General John Lambert and other officers  and installed Fleetwood as chief of a military council under the authority of the Speaker. The next day Lambert ordered that the doors of the House be shut and the members kept out. On 26 October a "Committee of Safety" was appointed, of which Fleetwood and Lambert were members. Lambert was appointed major-general of all the forces in England and Scotland, Fleetwood being general.[6] The Committee of Safety sent Lambert with a large force to meet George Monck, who was in command of the English forces in Scotland, and either negotiate with him or force him to come to terms.[6]
     It was into this atmosphere that Monck, the governor of Scotland under the Cromwells marched south with his army from Scotland. Lambert's army began to desert him, and he returned to London almost alone. Monck marched to London unopposed. The Presbyterian members, excluded in Pride's Purge of 1648, were recalled, and on 24 December the army restored the Long Parliament.[6] Fleetwood was deprived of his command and ordered to appear before Parliament to answer for his conduct. On 3 March 1660, Lambert was sent to the Tower of London, from which he escaped a month later. He tried to rekindle the civil war in favor of the Commonwealth by issuing a proclamation calling on all supporters of the "Good Old Cause" to rally on the battlefield of Edgehill, but he was recaptured by Colonel Richard Ingoldsby, a participant in the regicide of Charles I who hoped to win a pardon by handing Lambert over to the new regime.[6] Lambert was incarcerated and died in custody on Guernsey in 1694; Ingoldsby was indeed pardoned.

Sonnet 130 By William Shakespeare

Sonnet 130 
By William Shakespeare

My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun;
Coral is far more red than her lips’ red:
If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;
If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head.


I have seen roses damask’d, red and white,
But no such roses see I in her cheeks;
And in some perfumes is there more delight
Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks.


I love to hear her speak, yet well I know
That music hath a far more pleasing sound:
I grant I never saw a goddess go,
My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground:


And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
As any she belied with false compare.